Skip to main content

The Pessimistic Programmer

I decided to change the title of this blog to "The Pessimistic Programmer". Why? Am I a depressed person that thinks nothing will work? No, I am an optimist in life. Something good is going to happen today :-) But in programming, something will surely go wrong.

I don't actually view this as pessimism, but as realism. I want to be prepared for the worst that can possibly happen. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst. But my wife explained to me that pessimists always say that they are just being realistic. So, I might as well face it: I am a pessimist.

I think a good programmer needs to be pessimistic; always thinking about what can go wrong and how to prevent it. I don't say that I am a good programmer myself. No, I make far too many mistakes for that. But I have learnt how to manage my mistakes with testing and double checking.

Über-programmers can manage well without being pessimistic. They have total overview of the code and all consequences of changes. But I'm talking about us mere mortals. But if you are an über-programmer, you should be pessimistic about what the next guy will do to your code. Place some comments and unit tests in there, to keep him out of trouble!

An optimistic programmer doesn't see the need for unit tests. He will run the program and be satisfied when it runs one time without errors. He will say things like "What can possibly go wrong?" Or if something goes wrong anyway, "It must be an error in the input from that other module".

Haven't we all been there? Suddenly, I feel so old...


Brian said…
I agree with you: pessimism is a good trait to have if you're a programmer.

However, my pessimism tends to come in play more in the planning and design phase rather than the coding phase, as I try to identify the nasty little details and choices that may need to be made in order to accomplish a particular task.

Once I figure out how it can be done and assure myself that my approach makes sense, I don't worry as much about the code itself.
Mike Kaufman said…
I think one needs to be very pessimistic about the number and difficulty of problems you will encounter, but very optimistic about your ability to overcome them. One of several contradictory traits one needs as a programmer!
petrus said…
Man, you need a holiday! (As do all of us...)
Enrique said…
There are no Über-programmers, just regular ones that have not yet found the limit of classes and relationships that they can hold in their heads.

The experience only increases the complexity level required to become pessimistic. And when somebody performs a task well, people (or himself!) tend to assign him yet more complex tasks, because people always, always wants more.

After a few iterations, no matter how good you are, you're bound to be a pessimist. And you're bound to return to that state if, for any reason, you get to think that what you do now is easy.

So being pessimistic is not a trait of good developers. It's a consequence.


Popular posts from this blog

Database dump with Java

I need to update a database that is created by PHP. The problem is that I am not a PHP coder, but a Java coder, and I need to use some other Java libraries to get the job done. So how can find out exactly which tables to update and how? It would take me weeks to search the PHP code, and I still wouldn't be sure if I got it right.

The first step is to install a clean application on my computer. There is no user data in the database, so if I perform commands like creating a user etc in the web application, I can look at what changed in the database. I'm sure that could be done in MySQL, but I'm not an expert on that either. When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. So, I'll use Java for that to.

So, I wrote a small Java application that produces exactly the output that I need. It reads metadata from the database to find all tables and columns, lists that metadata and the content of all the rows.

Here it is:import;

The Future of Programming

The problem with abstractions Programmers are experts in abstract thinking. To program is to generalize: A method is a general specification of different execution paths. A class is a general specification of objects. A superclass is a generalization of several classes.

Although our minds are capable of abstract thinking, concrete thinking is more natural, and concrete examples are the foundation for abstractions. For instance, how do you teach children what a car is? You don't give a definition like: 'A car is a wheeled motor vehicle used for transporting passengers.' Instead, you point at a car and say: 'Look, a car!' After seeing a few cars, the child understands what a car is.

Notice what I just did! I started with a general principle and then gave an example. Which part of the paragraph above is easier to understand, the first sentence (general) or the rest (example)?

Einstein said that examples is not another way to teach, it is the only way to teach. It is…